Mercurial > jhg
diff cmdline/org/tmatesoft/hg/console/Main.java @ 367:2fadf8695f8a
Use 'revision index' instead of the vague 'local revision number' concept in the API
| author | Artem Tikhomirov <tikhomirov.artem@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| date | Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:37:27 +0100 |
| parents | 189dc6dc1c3e |
| children | ee8264d80747 d0e5dc3cae6e |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/cmdline/org/tmatesoft/hg/console/Main.java Fri Dec 16 04:43:18 2011 +0100 +++ b/cmdline/org/tmatesoft/hg/console/Main.java Fri Dec 16 15:37:27 2011 +0100 @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ 3 revisions - 80 ms vs 250 ms (250ms init) 4 revisions - 110 ms vs 265 ms (265 ms init) 5 revisions - 94 vs 266. - complete iteration in changelog.getLocalRevision(tipNodeid) takes 47 ms + complete iteration in changelog.getRevisionIndex(tipNodeid) takes 47 ms compared to complete iteration inside RevisionMap.init() of 171 ms. The only difference is latter instantiates Nodeids, while former compares binary content as is. Hence, with 20-30 ms per regular getLocalRevision, it pays off to use RevisionMap with at least 15-20 @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ revs[0] = changelog.getRevision(tip); long start = System.currentTimeMillis(); for (int i = 0; i < revs.length; i++) { - final int localRev = changelog.getLocalRevision(revs[i]); + final int localRev = changelog.getRevisionIndex(revs[i]); System.out.printf("%d:%s\n", localRev, revs[i]); } System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis() - start); @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ rmap = changelog.new RevisionMap().init(); long s2 = System.currentTimeMillis(); for (int i = 0; i < revs.length; i++) { - final int localRev = rmap.localRevision(revs[i]); + final int localRev = rmap.revisionIndex(revs[i]); System.out.printf("%d:%s\n", localRev, revs[i]); } System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis() - start);